:: Coal, like Mike Pence, is so 20th century
	
	by David Hoppe   
	 Change is hard. I mean really, really hard. 
    I used to think change required a crisis of some kind.  But in the fourth year of a devastating drought, Californians can’t even agree  on how to measure the amount of water they have left. 
    According to a ProPublica article by Abraham  Lustgarten, published recently in the New York Times, Californians continue to  insist on keeping separate accounts regarding the water they take from  above-ground sources, like rivers, and the water drawn from below ground — even  though these sources are often interconnected parts of the same system. 
    Lustgarten is forced to state the obvious about this  delusional practice: “What this means is that there is even less water than  people think…” 
    Why do Californians persist in this mismanagement of  their most important resource when so much is at stake? Well, because so much  is at stake. For starters, the state’s traditional agriculture industry, which  has pushed back against sustainability legislation. 
    Something similar is happening in Indiana. Gov. Mike  Pence has been publicly polishing his coal industry credentials, proclaiming  that Indiana will just say no when it comes to EPA efforts to reduce emissions  from coal-fired power plants by 2030. 
    Indiana, as we know, is a state particularly dependent  on coal. We rely on the stuff for 85 percent of our energy needs. We mine it,  and the coal industry is a big contributor to political campaigns.  
    So it’s not surprising when Pence argues further  regulating the coal industry will lead to the retirement of some coal-fired  plants and hiking rates for businesses and individuals. In a letter to  President Obama, Pence wrote that cutting back on emissions would threaten “our  stable source of affordable electricity.” 
    The governor fails to take into account that burning  coal constitutes a known and measurable health hazard in Hoosier communities, a  hazard that makes his “stable source of affordable electricity” an increasingly  onerous trade-off.  
    But he misses something even bigger: the increasing  obsolescence of fossil fuels.  
    As Paul Gilding writes for RenewEconomy, American coal  companies have lost about 75 percent of their value in the last few years,  while over the same period, the Dow Jones industrial average was going up by  nearly the same amount. 
    Coal, in other words, is so 20th century. 
    Gilding goes on to observe that we are in the midst of  a technology-driven sea change: “For over 100 years, energy markets have been  defined by physical resources, supplied in large volumes by large, slow-moving  companies,” he writes. “The new emerging energy system of renewables and  storage is a ‘technology’ business, more akin to information and communications  technology; where prices keep falling, quality keeps rising, change is rapid  and market disruption is normal and constant.” 
    Gilding notes that traditional energy industry players  are neither culturally nor structurally equipped to respond to these changes in  a timely way.  
    That’s where leadership comes in. Gov. Pence could be  using his office to help wean Indiana off its cumbersome, unhealthy dependence  on coal. He could be trying to get us ready for what’s next.  
But, like I said, change is  hard.
  
	
        
	  
	   |