David Hoppe is available
Site managed by
:: Barack and Blago
By David Hoppe
Language, according to the late, great writer and counter-culture wise guy William S. Burroughs, is a virus. Burroughs did most of his work with language before the Internet found popular favor. But were he around today, he'd probably find most of what's going on in our wired world all too predictable.
Burroughs might be amused, for example, by our infatuation with information. Information is the currency the Internet runs on. Indeed, once upon a time, the 'net was called "the Information Superhighway," a conduit capable of closing the gap between the "information rich" and "information poor," providing people with an almost infinite array of resources that would make their lives better.
Information, according to this formulation, was like air. It was objective, factual, useful.
But just as air can be tainted with barely detectable toxins, information is complicated by language. And since language, as Burroughs pointed out, is viral, it has a way of making information weird.
Take this item from last week's Washington Post . It revealed that when President Obama traveled to Chicago to celebrate his 49 th birthday, he reportedly called on three Christian pastors to pray with him via a telephone conference call. According to Joel Hunter, one of the pastors who participated, the session dealt with the year that had passed, what's really important in life, and the challenges ahead.
What made this a story, as far as the Washington Post was concerned, was that it shed light on the low-key and private character of Obama's Christianity, something worth noting because recent polls, including a Harris survey taken last spring, have shown that as many as 57 percent of Republicans insist on believing Obama is a Muslim. The story implied that Obama might do himself a favor in terms of public relations if he wore his Christianity more prominently on his sleeve.
But that assumes a little more information might change, or at least temper, the way some people think. Given the viral nature of language, its ability to feed upon itself and find its own logic, this seems like wishful thinking. It wasn't that long ago that Obama was being slammed for membership at a Christian church presided over by radical preacher Jeremiah Wright. Whatever he does, it seems clear that those already disposed to hate Obama are incapable of being swayed by information. It's language that carries them away.
Across the border in Illinois, the news media has created a long-running carnival based on the profane misadventures of the state's impeached governor, Rod Blagojevich, or Blago as he is disaffectionately known.
Blago, like Richard Nixon, was undone by information revealed through audio recordings. But where Nixon was recorded scheming to compromise the Constitution, Blago was caught merely being venal, bitching about money -- mostly about how totally pissed-off he was that he couldn't parlay his office and, in particular, Barack Obama's Senate seat, into a juicy payday.
The information contained in Blago's tapes was outrageous. But not necessarily for the reasons the media claimed. As far as the media has been concerned, Blago was the hood ornament for the corruption permeating Illinois politics. Even worse was Blago's self-aggrandizing sense of entitlement. The guy was crass, a paragon of bad taste who spent tens of thousands of dollars on custom-tailored clothes and then turned around and complained that he didn't have enough money to send his daughter to college.
The media, following Patrick Fitzgerald, the Federal Prosecutor responsible for bringing Blago to trial, seemed hellbent on making an example of this guy. They amassed a small mountain of damning information but forgot one thing: Information is not the same as evidence. In the end, the jury gave Blago a pass on 23 of 24 counts filed against him. The only charge that stuck was for lying to Federal authorities, who now say they want a retrial. Blago says they should be out trying to catch real criminals.
For once, he may have a point. While Blagojevich's story has had a viral life of its own, playing out across a range of media platforms from reality TV to talk radio, even finding a moment in the subculture of Elvis impersonators when he covered "Treat me Nice" at a street festival, all this information revealed little that is actually criminal. You can find Blago guilty of bad taste, but so what?
The real outrage should be that a twerp like Blago got himself elected governor in the first place. Chalk that up to connections and corruption, if you like, but the people of Illinois voted for him once and then for a second term. They elected him to Congress before that. Where was the information that might have enabled them to make a better choice? Surely there were plenty of facts about Rod Blagojevich that might have disqualified him for public office. But no one was describing him then the way they do now. The language for Blago had yet to get weird.
Or, as Burroughs might have put it, the virus was still latent.